![]() In Study 2 ( N = 39), we found good construct convergent validity of short-form D-FAW with another widely used scale (PANAS). When participant instructions focus on the past week, then affect is best represented by two or three mood-based factors. When participant instructions focus on now or today, then affect is best represented by five discrete emotion factors. In Study 1, across six applied sample groups ( N = 2624), we found that the factor structure of the short-form D-FAW is robust when issued as a standalone measure, and that it should be scored differently depending on the participant instruction used. ![]() In this article, we used a short-form measure of affective well-being with 10 items: the Daniels five-factor measure of affective well-being (D-FAW). ![]() ![]() However, these scales are seldom validated as standalone, comprehensive measures in their own right. To reduce the burden on participants in applied settings, short-form measures of affective well-being are proving popular. As such, researchers and policy-makers need to be confident that well-being measures are valid, reliable and robust. Measuring affective well-being in organizational studies has become increasingly widespread, given its association with key work-performance and other markers of organizational functioning.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |